高级检索

不同加载速率下胶结充填体声发射及裂纹演化特征

Acoustic emission and crack evolution characteristics of cemented tailings backfill under different loading rates

  • 摘要: 为探究加载速率v对胶结充填体裂纹演化机制的动态调控规律,开展了v=0.002,0.004,0.008,0.010 mm/s下的单轴压缩同步声发射试验。通过分析声发射振铃计数、平均频率(AF)、上升时间−幅值比(RA)及r值(RA/AF)的时变特征,并结合高斯混合模型(GMM)与移动平均滤波算法对RA-AF数据集进行无监督聚类,以识别裂纹类型及其演化规律。研究结果表明:① 峰值应力(σf)附近,充填体的声发射振铃计数呈现区间震荡现象,随着v增大,充填体的弹性变形及塑性屈服阶段的振铃计数波动率减小;② v从0.002增至0.010 mm/s时,AF分布集中范围随速率增加由0~150 kHz压缩至0~100 kHz,RA分布集中范围由0~5 ms/V扩展至0~10 ms/V,且高RA信号集中于AF<80 kHz窄带;③ v增大对峰后破坏模式具有显著影响,剪切裂纹比例由19.11%(v=0.002 mm/s)跃升至64.23%(v=0.010 mm/s),表明v增大会驱动破坏机制从拉伸破坏主导向拉伸−剪切复合型破坏转化;④ 以加载应力阶段为界限,GMM聚类分析可将充填体的裂纹演化分为拉伸裂纹主导(0~20%σf)、拉伸−剪切裂纹转化(20%σf~80%σf)、剪切裂纹快速增长(80%σf ~100%σf)和剪切−拉伸裂纹共同主导(峰后破坏)4个阶段,其中剪切裂纹在80%σf ~100%σf处的快速增长是充填体局部失稳破坏的前兆特征。研究可为充填体的稳定性分析与破坏预测提供理论支持。

     

    Abstract: To investigate the dynamic regulation mechanism of loading rate on crack evolution in cemented tailings backfill (CTB), uniaxial compression tests with acoustic emission (AE) monitoring were conducted at loading rates v of 0.002, 0.004, 0.008, and 0.010 mm/s. By analyzing the time-varying characteristics of AE parameters, including ring count, average frequency AF, rise time–amplitude ratio RA, and r-value (RA/AF), and applying unsupervised clustering to RA–AF datasets using Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) combined with a moving average filter, crack types and their evolution patterns were identified. The results indicate that: ① Near peak stress, AE ring counts of CTB exhibit interval oscillations. With increasing loading rate, the fluctuation amplitude of ring counts during elastic and plastic yield stages decreases. ② As the loading rate increases from 0.002 to 0.010 mm/s, the concentrated range of AF distribution exhibited a progressive compression from 0 − 150 kHz to 0 − 100 kHz, while the RA distribution range expanded from 0 − 5 ms/V to 0 − 10 ms/V, with high-RA signals concentrated in the narrow band of AF < 80 kHz. ③ The increase in loading rate significantly affects the post-peak failure mode: the proportion of shear cracks rises sharply from 19.11% (v=0.002 mm/s) to 64.23% (0.010 mm/s), indicating a shift in failure mechanism from tensile-dominated to tensile–shear composite failure. ④ Based on stress stages, GMM clustering divides crack evolution into four phases: tensile crack dominance (0 − 20%σf), tensile–shear crack transition (20%σf − 80%σf), rapid shear crack growth (80%σf − 100%σf), and tensile–shear co-dominance (post-peak failure). Among them, the rapid increase in shear cracks at 80% – 100% of peak stress is identified as a precursor to localized instability. This study provides theoretical support for stability analysis and failure prediction of CTB.

     

/

返回文章
返回