高级检索

煤气化细渣粒度−密度双变量分级分质特性研究

Investigation of bivariate particle size-density classification and quality differentiation of coal gasification fine slag

  • 摘要: 物理分选在煤气化细渣炭−灰分离中存在局限性,加强细渣组成结构性质的基础研究,将有助于提高炭−灰分离效率。针对典型GSP气流床煤气化细渣开展粒度−密度分级分质处理,通过烧失量分析、XRD矿物分析、SEM形貌分析和N2气吸附等表征手段,系统研究了细渣分级分质组分的残炭分布规律、灰样的宏观形貌、颗粒微观形貌和孔隙结构等物理特征。结果表明,细渣中残炭主要为无定形炭和多孔炭;无定形炭约占细渣总量的8%~14%;多孔炭分布约占细渣总量的10%。各组分灰样宏观形貌与矿物成分对应关系为:灰样颜色深红−浅红−黑色,对应矿物组成为赤铁矿/含铁云母−钙长石/方石英−方铁矿,该结果为基于视觉特征对细渣矿物鉴别提供了依据。结合细渣分级分质组分的残炭含量、微观形貌和孔隙结构,溯源了细渣颗粒的产生历程,并将细渣中典型的颗粒群分为了3类:①无定形炭,主要集中在细粒级(0.074~0.25 mm)和低密度级(<1.9 g/cm3)中,炭−灰交织共存,比表面积居中;②多孔炭,集中在中粗粒级(0.074~0.25 mm)和中高密度级(1.9~2.3 g/cm3)中,内孔发达比表面积大;③熔渣颗粒,主要聚集在粗粒级(>0.25 mm)和高密度级(>2.5 g/cm3)中,比表面积最小。可针对2种残炭的物理特性开发不同分选回收方法,回收的无定形炭可作燃料补充,多孔炭宜作吸附材料,而熔渣颗粒可用于建材领域。

     

    Abstract: Physical separation has inherent limitations in the carbon-ash separation of coal gasification fine slag(CGFS). Strengthening fundamental research on the composition and structural properties of CGFS can enhance separation efficiency. This study investigates the particle size-density classification characteristic of typical GSP entrained-flow coal gasification fine slag. The distribution patterns of residual carbon, macroscopic morphology of ash samples, micro-morphology of particles, and pore structure characteristics are systematically investigated by loss on ignition analysis, XRD mineral analysis, SEM morphology analysis, and N2 gas adsorption. The results indicate that residual carbon in the CGFS primarily exists as two forms:amorphous carbon and porous carbon. Amorphous carbon accounts for approximately 8-14% of the total fine slag, while porous carbon constitutes about 10%. A clear correlation is observed between the macroscopic morphology of ash samples and their mineral compositions: ash colors ranging from deep red to light red to black correspond to mineral assemblages of hematite/iron-bearing mica, anorthite/cristobalite, and wüstite, respectively. This finding provides a basis for mineral identification in CGFS using visual features. Combining residual carbon content, micro-morphology, and pore structure of classified fractions, we traced the formation pathways of CGFS particles and categorized them into three typical groups: “Amorphous carbon”: Primarily found in fine-sized (0.074-0.25 mm) and low-density (<1.9 g/cm3) fractions, featuring interwoven carbon-ash fusion and a moderate specific surface area. “Porous carbon”: Present in medium-coarse size fractions (0.074-0.25 mm) and medium-high density fractions (1.9-2.3 g/cm3), with well-developed internal pores and a large specific surface area. “Slag particles”: Predominantly in coarse size fractions (>0.25 mm) and high-density fractions (>2.5 g/cm3), possessing the smallest specific surface area. Separation and recovery methods should be tailored to the characteristics of the two residual carbon types.Recovered amorphous carbon can serve as a fuel supplement, porous carbon is suitable for adsorption applications, and slag particles can be purposed in construction materials.

     

/

返回文章
返回