高级检索

煤层底板复杂架构岩层多要素融合阻隔水能力评价

Evaluation of water barrier performance of complexly structured rock strata in coal seam floor based on multi-element integration

  • 摘要: 在深部煤炭资源开采过程中,煤层底板承受着巨大的水压威胁,其下伏含水层的水害风险尤为突出。介于煤层与主要威胁含水层之间的复合岩层,因其具有结构高度复杂、空间厚度显著不均一以及不同岩性层段含水性差异悬殊等特点,其整体阻隔水性能的定量评估成为实现煤层底板水害超前精准防控的关键环节和核心科学问题。传统评价方法往往侧重于宏观地质特征,难以全面刻画岩层内部微观结构的控水效应,亟需构建更为精细且综合的评价体系。文中融合宏−微观双尺度指标,选取断层复杂程度、有效隔水层厚度、质量比值系数、复合抗压强度、塑脆性岩厚比和岩心采取率为宏观指标,复合面积孔隙率与复合孔隙体积率为微观指标,构建综合评价指标体系。基于博弈论集成序关系分析法(G1)与评价准则间相关重要性法(CRITIC)的主客观权重,应用构建的正态云模型实现复合岩层阻隔水能力定量评价。同时,对比分析宏观单尺度和宏微观双尺度下的矿区阻隔水性能。结果表明:断层复杂程度与孔隙特征参数在指标体系中占有显著比重,印证了断裂构造与微观裂隙发育程度是控制该类复合岩层阻隔水性能的主导因素;基于正态云模型的综合判定显示,研究区底板复合岩层整体阻隔水能力偏弱;相较于传统单一的宏观尺度,融合微观指标的双尺度评价能够更精确地捕捉岩层内部微观缺陷的控水效应,其评价结果与已知断裂分布及工作面实地回采情况高度吻合。引入面积孔隙率与复合孔隙体积率微观指标,利用多要素融合的方式建立宏微观双尺度评价指标因子体系,并通过与已知断裂分布、工作面回采情况进行比对验证,证实了文中所建模型及评价结果的可靠性。研究成果不仅深化了对复杂岩层阻隔水机理的认识,也为类似地质条件下的矿井水害防治提供了可借鉴的定量评价工具。

     

    Abstract: In the process of deep coal resource mining, the coal seam floor is subjected to significant water pressure, and the water hazard risk from the underlying aquifer is particularly prominent. The composite strata between the coal seam and the main water-threatening aquifer are characterized by highly complex structures, significant spatial heterogeneity in thickness, and substantial differences in water-bearing properties among different lithological sections. Therefore, the quantitative evaluation of their overall water-barrier performance has become a key link and core scientific issue for the proactive and precise prevention and control of coal seam floor water hazards. Traditional evaluation methods mainly focus on macroscopic geological characteristics and are unable to fully characterize the water-controlling effect of the internal microstructure of rock strata. Therefore, a more refined and comprehensive evaluation system is urgently needed. In this study, macro–micro dual-scale indicators were integrated. Fault complexity, effective aquiclude thickness, mass ratio coefficient, composite compressive strength, plastic-to-brittle rock thickness ratio, and core recovery rate were selected as macroscopic indicators, while composite area porosity and composite pore volume ratio were selected as microscopic indicators, thereby constructing a comprehensive evaluation index system. Based on the subjective and objective weights obtained by integrating the G1 method and the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method using game theory, the constructed normal cloud model was applied to quantitatively evaluate the water-barrier capacity of composite strata. Meanwhile, the water-barrier performance of the mining area was compared and analyzed under the macroscopic single-scale framework and the macro–micro dual-scale framework. The results show that fault complexity and pore-structure parameters account for significant proportions in the index system, confirming that fault structures and the degree of microfracture development are the dominant factors controlling the water-barrier performance of such composite strata. The comprehensive evaluation based on the normal cloud model indicates that the overall water-barrier capacity of the floor composite strata in the study area is relatively weak. Compared with the traditional single macroscopic-scale evaluation, the dual-scale evaluation incorporating microscopic indicators can more accurately capture the water-controlling effect of internal microstructural defects in rock strata, and the evaluation results are highly consistent with the known fault distribution and actual mining conditions of working faces. By introducing microscopic indicators, namely composite area porosity and composite pore volume ratio, a macro–micro dual-scale evaluation index system based on multi-factor integration was established. The reliability of the proposed model and evaluation results was further verified through comparison with known fault distribution and working-face mining conditions. The research results not only deepen the understanding of the water-barrier mechanism of complex rock strata, but also provide a quantitative evaluation tool for mine water hazard prevention and control under similar geological conditions.

     

/

返回文章
返回