高级检索

不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后煤体动力学及破坏特性

Dynamic characteristics and failure mechanisms of coal after different supercritical CO2 erosion durations

  • 摘要: 用于封存CO2煤层的稳定性会受到地层活化等地质运动的影响,且CO2在地质封存过程中多以超临界态存在。为研究封存CO2的煤层受冲击荷载扰动的影响,基于高压气体吸附−解吸及霍普金森压杆(SHPB)试验系统,对经不同超临界CO2(Sc-CO2)浸蚀时间(0、2、4、6 d)后的煤体分别开展冲击压缩与冲击劈裂2种动态加载试验,并结合扫描电子显微镜(SEM)与傅里叶红外光谱(FTIR)测试,从而对煤体微细观结构进行表征。主要分析煤体的动力学强度参数、能量演化及破坏裂纹特征的变化特性。同时,引入标准差标准化方法以消除不同参量间的量纲差异,定量对比各项参量的变化幅度。结果表明:Sc-CO2可显著促进煤体微小孔裂隙发育,并优先破坏极性或低极性官能团,导致煤体含氧结构减少、分子间作用力下降和结构趋于芳香化,从而使煤体结构强度劣化。随浸蚀时间增加,煤样抗压强度由30.44  MPa降至14.84  MPa,抗拉强度由5.17  MPa降至2.68  MPa,弹性模量与加载率均有不同程度降低,并呈现前期快速和后期缓慢的非线性退化特征;在2种加载模式下,煤体反射能占比逐步上升,而破碎耗能与能量利用率均逐渐下降,其中,浸蚀6 d后,冲击压缩条件下的能量利用率降至13.90%(较未浸蚀煤样降低57.03%),冲击劈裂条件下的能量利用率降至6.89%(较未浸蚀煤样降低16.28%),表明煤体达到破坏阈值所需吸收的能量减少;此外,煤样表面裂隙率和裂隙分形维数均随浸蚀时间增加而升高,冲击破坏的裂纹扩展不规则且分支增多,破坏网络更加复杂;Sc-CO2对峰值强度及强度劣化度的影响在冲击劈裂条件下更为显著,而对破碎耗能、能量利用率、表面裂隙率和裂隙分形维数的影响在冲击压缩条件下更强,反映出不同加载模式下能量分配与破坏机制的差异。研究结果可为封存CO2的煤层稳定性评估及防护提供一定的理论参考。

     

    Abstract: The stability of CO2-sequestered coal seams may be affected by geological disturbances such as strata reactivation, and CO2 generally exists in a supercritical state during geological sequestration. To investigate the influence of impact loading disturbances on coal seams used for CO2 storage, dynamic compression and dynamic splitting tests were conducted on coal specimens subjected to different supercritical CO2 (Sc-CO2) erosion durations of 0, 2, 4, 6 d, using a high-pressure gas adsorption–desorption system and a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing system. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were employed to characterize the micro- and meso-scale structural features of the coal. The variations in dynamic strength parameters, energy evolution, and failure-crack characteristics of the coal were systematically analyzed. Meanwhile, a standard deviation standardization method was introduced to eliminate dimensional differences among different parameters and to quantitatively compare their relative variation magnitudes. The results indicate that Sc-CO2 significantly promotes the development of micro-pores and micro-cracks in coal and preferentially damages polar or weakly polar functional groups, resulting in a reduction in oxygen-containing structures, weakened intermolecular interactions, and a tendency toward structural aromatization. Consequently, the structural strength of the coal is degraded. With increasing erosion duration, the compressive strength of the coal specimens decreases from 30.44 MPa to 14.84 MPa, while the tensile strength decreases from 5.17 MPa to 2.68 MPa. The elastic modulus and loading rate also decline to varying degrees, exhibiting a nonlinear degradation pattern characterized by rapid deterioration in the early stage and gradual attenuation in the later stage. Under both loading modes, the proportion of reflected energy gradually increases, whereas the crushing energy dissipation and energy utilization efficiency progressively decrease. After 6 d of erosion, the energy utilization efficiency under impact compression decreases to 13.90%, representing a 57.03% reduction compared with the uneroded coal specimens; under impact splitting, it decreases to 6.89%, corresponding to a 16.28% reduction. These results suggest that the energy required for coal to reach the failure threshold is reduced after Sc-CO2 erosion. Furthermore, both the surface crack ratio and crack fractal dimension of the coal specimens increase with erosion duration. The crack propagation induced by impact failure becomes more irregular, with increased branching and a more complex fracture network. The influence of Sc-CO2 on peak strength and strength degradation degree is more pronounced under impact splitting conditions, whereas its effects on crushing energy dissipation, energy utilization efficiency, surface crack ratio, and crack fractal dimension are stronger under impact compression conditions. This reflects the differences in energy distribution and failure mechanisms under different dynamic loading modes. The findings of this study provide theoretical guidance for the stability evaluation and protection of coal seams used for CO2 geological sequestration.

     

/

返回文章
返回