高级检索

基于机器学习的煤与瓦斯突出预测方法研究现状与发展趋势

Machine learning-based methods for coal and gas outburst prediction: current research status and future perspectives

  • 摘要: 随着能源需求持续增长,浅层煤炭资源逐渐枯竭,煤炭开采不断向深部推进。深部煤层普遍呈现高地应力、强吸附、低渗透等特征,地质条件更加复杂,使煤与瓦斯突出孕育过程多因素耦合、突发性增强、预测难度显著提高。为提升风险识别的准确性与稳定性,采用系统综述方法,梳理了煤与瓦斯突出的代表性机理假说及其演化过程,归纳了瓦斯压力、瓦斯含量、地应力、煤体结构和采掘扰动等关键致因机理,分析了煤与瓦斯突出形成过程的多场耦合特征。在此基础上,全面总结了机器学习在突出预测中的应用研究,系统梳理了判别分析、聚类分析、决策树、支持向量机、人工神经网络、极限学习机和集成学习等算法的研究进展,比较了各类方法在可解释性、非线性拟合能力、对数据质量的敏感性以及适应复杂地质条件方面的优劣势。结果表明:判别分析和聚类分析适用于样本数量有限和模式发现的场景,但抗干扰能力不足;决策树具有较好的可解释性,便于抽取风险判别规则,但易过拟合。支持向量机在小样本、高维非线性条件下表现稳定;神经网络类方法拟合能力强,能够捕捉多因素耦合关系,但可解释性不足且依赖高质量样本;极限学习机训练速度快、适合快速建模,但泛化能力需改进;而集成学习通过集成多个基学习器提升了鲁棒性与泛化能力,在跨矿区预测和复杂场景下表现出更优的稳定性和适应性,是未来研究和应用的重点方向。基于此,研究提出以集成学习为核心的研究路线,强调将机理约束引入模型构建,推动多源数据融合与智能算法深度结合,并结合可解释性分析和动态更新机制提高预测结果的可信度和落地性。结论表明,发展集成学习与机理数据融合策略,不仅有助于突破现有模型的泛化与稳定性瓶颈,还能为构建跨区域、可推广、可解释的智能化煤与瓦斯突出预测平台提供系统方法论支撑,对矿井灾害的主动预防和本质安全保障具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract: With the continuous growth of energy demand and the gradual depletion of shallow coal resources, coal mining is increasingly extended to greater depths. Deep coal seams are generally characterized by high ground stress, strong gas adsorption, and low permeability, while their geological conditions become more complex. As a result, the gestation process of coal and gas outburst is governed by stronger multi-factor coupling and greater suddenness, and its prediction becomes substantially more difficult. To improve the accuracy and stability of risk identification, a systematic review method is adopted to summarize the representative mechanism hypotheses and evolutionary processes of coal and gas outburst. The key causative mechanisms associated with gas pressure, gas content, ground stress, coal structure, and mining disturbance are reviewed, and the multi-field coupling characteristics involved in the formation process of coal and gas outburst are analyzed. On this basis, the application of machine learning in coal and gas outburst prediction is comprehensively summarized. The research progress of discriminant analysis, clustering analysis, decision trees, support vector machines, artificial neural networks, extreme learning machines, and ensemble learning is systematically reviewed. The advantages and limitations of these methods are compared in terms of interpretability, nonlinear fitting capability, sensitivity to data quality, and adaptability to complex geological conditions. The results indicate that discriminant analysis and clustering analysis are suitable for scenarios with limited samples and pattern discovery, but their anti-interference capability remains insufficient. Decision trees exhibit good interpretability and facilitate the extraction of risk discrimination rules, whereas they are prone to overfitting. Support vector machines show stable performance under small-sample, high-dimensional, and nonlinear conditions. Neural-network-based methods possess strong fitting capability and are able to capture multi-factor coupling relationships, but their interpretability is limited and their performance depends heavily on high-quality samples. Extreme learning machines are characterized by high training efficiency and are suitable for rapid modeling, although their generalization capability still requires further improvement. By integrating multiple base learners, ensemble learning enhances robustness and generalization capability and demonstrates superior stability and adaptability in cross-mine prediction and complex application scenarios. It is therefore regarded as a key direction for future research and engineering application. Accordingly, an ensemble-learning-centered research framework is developed, in which mechanism constraints are incorporated into model construction, multi-source data fusion is promoted in combination with intelligent algorithms, and interpretability analysis and dynamic updating mechanisms are integrated to improve the reliability and practical applicability of prediction results. The conclusions show that the development of ensemble learning and mechanism–data fusion strategies helps overcome the limitations of existing models in generalization and stability. It also provides methodological support for the construction of cross-regional, transferable, and interpretable intelligent prediction platforms for coal and gas outburst, thereby contributing to proactive mine-disaster prevention and intrinsic safety assurance.

     

/

返回文章
返回