高级检索

定向聚能作用下静态破碎剂膨胀力学特性试验研究

Study on the expansion mechanical properties of static cracking agent under directional energy-concentrating effects

  • 摘要: 针对静态破碎剂(SCA)在工程应用中存在的致裂方向随机、能量利用率低及易发生喷孔等关键技术问题,设计了一种集定向引导、能量聚集与防喷控制于一体的“定向聚能结构”,该结构由定向切缝管、弹性密织囊袋及快接堵头三部分组成,通过物理约束与结构引导,旨在实现SCA膨胀力的定向集中释放、扭转轴向冲孔力为径向膨胀力。为系统揭示其作用机制,首先在分析SCA水化反应膨胀机理的基础上,建立约束式结构下SCA膨胀应力演化模型,明确最大膨胀应力(Pmax)、等效加速系数(k)、峰值时间(tp)、峰后泄压衰减系数(c)四大关键参数,阐明定向聚能结构通过能量聚集与应力导向调控SCA膨胀行为的内在作用机制;然后采用外钢管法设计3组对比试验,包括常规灌注式、定向约束及定向聚能约束,利用布置于钢管壁的电阻应变片与K型热电偶,实时采集SCA反应过程中的应变与温度数据,记录其膨胀力学特性演化过程。试验结果表明,所有约束式结构下SCA膨胀应力演化均呈现“缓慢增长—快速增长—峰后下降”的三阶段特征,但定向聚能约束展现出显著的性能提升。以ϕ50 mm钢管试验条件为例,定向聚能约束试验中预设切缝方向上的峰值膨胀应力达到162 MPa,反应时间缩短至20 min,峰值温度高达238 °C。与常规灌注式和定向约束式结构相比,定向聚能结构在切缝位置测得的峰值膨胀应力分别提高了57.50%~79.12%和58.80%~76.45%;其膨胀应力增长速率最高达到8.22 MPa/min,高于对照组的3.67 MPa/min和3.92 MPa/min;峰值温度升高率分别为87.84%和133.90%。能量利用率计算表明,该结构使SCA水化反应的能量转化效率较常规灌注方式提升了近一倍。利用所建模型对试验数据进行拟合,获得高于0.90的拟合优度,其关键参数(Pmaxk)满足“定向聚能约束>定向约束>常规灌注式”,(tpc)满足“常规灌注式>定向约束>定向聚能约束”的规律,与理论分析结果一致,验证了模型的可靠性与定向聚能结构的调控效果。定向聚能作用下SCA水化膨胀作用机制在于:快接堵头实现轴向密封,抑制喷孔并促使轴向力向径向转变,定向切缝管引导膨胀应力在预设方向高度集中,而整体的密闭结构则促进反应能量与高温高压蒸汽的积聚。

     

    Abstract: Aiming at the key technical problems in the engineering application of Static Cracking Agent (SCA), such as random crack propagation, low energy utilization efficiency, and susceptibility to ejection, a “directional energy-concentrating structure” integrating directional guidance, energy concentration, and ejection control was designed. This structure consists of three components: a directional slit tube, an elastic woven bag, and quick-connect plugs. Through physical constraint and structural guidance, it aims to achieve directional concentration of SCA expansion force and convert axial ejection force into radial expansion. To systematically reveal its mechanism, based on the analysis of the expansion mechanism of SCA hydration reaction, an evolution model of SCA expansion stress under constrained structure was established. Four key parameters were defined: maximum expansion stress (Pmax), equivalent acceleration coefficient (k), peak time (tp), and post-peak pressure decay coefficient (c). This clarifies the internal mechanism by which the directional energy-concentrating structure regulates SCA expansion behavior through energy accumulation and stress guidance. Subsequently, three sets of comparative tests were designed using the external steel tube method, including conventional pouring, directional constraint, and directional energy-concentrating constraint. Resistance strain gauges and K-type thermocouples installed on the steel tube wall were used to collect strain and temperature data in real-time during the SCA reaction, recording the evolution of its expansive mechanical properties. The experimental results show that the expansion stress evolution of SCA under allconstrained structure exhibits a three-stage characteristic of “slow growth – rapid growth – post-peak decline”, but the directional energy-concentrating constraint demonstrates significant performance improvement. Taking the test condition with a ϕ50 mm steel tube as an example, in the directional energy-concentrating constraint test, the peak expansion stress in the preset slit direction reached 162 MPa, the reaction time was shortened to 20 min, and the peak temperature rose to 238 °C. Compared with conventional pouring and directional constrained structure, the peak expansion stress measured at the slit locations by the directional energy-concentrating structure increased by 57.50%−79.12% and 58.80%−76.45%, respectively. Its maximum expansion stress growth rate reached 8.22 MPa/min, significantly higher than the 3.67 MPa/min and 3.92 MPa/min of the control groups. The peak temperature increase rates were 87.84% and 133.90%, respectively. Energy utilization calculations indicate that this structure nearly doubled the energy conversion efficiency of the SCA hydration reaction compared to the conventional pouring method. Meanwhile, fitting the experimental data with the established model yielded a goodness-of-fit higher than 0.90. Its key parameters (Pmax, k) followed the pattern of "directional energy-concentrating constraint > directional constraint > conventional pouring", while (tp, c) followed "conventional pouring > directional constraint > directional energy-concentrating constraint," consistent with the theoretical analysis. This verifies the reliability of the model and the regulatory effect of the directional energy-concentrating structure. The mechanism of SCA hydration and expansion under directional energy-concentrating action lies in: the quick-connect plugs achieving axial sealing, suppressing ejection, and promoting the conversion of axial force to radial expansion; the directional slit tube guiding high concentration of expansion stress in the preset direction; and the overall sealed structure facilitating the accumulation of reaction energy and high-temperature, high-pressure steam.

     

/

返回文章
返回