高级检索

不同界面强度岩充岩组合体协同承载与破坏特征

Synergistic bearing and failure characteristics of rock-backfill-rock composites with different interface strength

  • 摘要: 煤矿结构充填开采中,通过在采空区关键位置布置结构充填体形成“充填体−围岩”协同承载结构,可有效控制地表沉陷和提高开采效率。但界面强度不足会导致充填体与围岩之间的滑动、剪切破坏,影响“直接顶−充填体−直接底”复合结构稳定性。为研究界面强度对“直接顶−充填体−直接底”复合结构协同承载与破坏特征的影响规律,开展界面强度为1.43~30.87 MPa岩充岩组合体的单轴压缩试验,得到组合体强度、弹性模量随界面强度的变化规律,采用DIC数字图像相关和声发射(AE)精准分析岩充岩组合体破坏特征,并结合组合体界面力学特性和能量累积耗散特征揭示组合体协同破坏机理。结果表明:岩充岩组合体的强度和弹性模量随界面强度增大而增大;界面强度为1.43 MPa时,岩充岩组合体破坏裂纹始于界面且沿着界面横向扩展贯通,裂纹主要分布在充填体部分:界面强度增至临界试验阈值5.69 MPa时,砂岩部分出现大能量定位点,AE能量和累计能量呈数量级递增,充填体部分的裂纹扩展贯通后经界面延伸至砂岩部分,岩充岩组合体实现协同破坏,这一界面强度低于充填单体强度11.30 MPa;界面强度由1.43 MPa增大至30.87 MPa时,岩充岩组合体破坏裂纹由拉伸裂纹主导转变为剪切裂纹主导;由界面力学特性分析可知,界面强度高于临界理论阈值5.15 MPa时,界面最大切应力(5.61~17.70 MPa)低于其对应岩充岩组合体的界面强度(5.69~30.87 MPa),界面不会发生滑移破坏。界面最大压应力11.41~12.26 MPa高于充填单体强度,可约束充填体部分的损伤,岩充岩组合体的强度由充填体强度主控−界面切应力辅控,能够实现协同承载;由Drucker-Prager强度准则分析可知,界面约束作用下,砂岩部分强度减弱而充填体部分强度增强,界面强度增大利于充填体部分破坏释放的能量达到砂岩部分的储能极限;由能量累积耗散特征可知,界面强度为5.69~30.87 MPa时,岩充岩组合体的储能极限(20.22~26.31 kJ·m−3)和峰值耗散比(0.20~0.26)均高于充填单体的储能极限20.15 kJ·m−3和峰值耗散比0.17,岩充岩组合体裂纹扩展贯通程度高于充填体部分,岩充岩组合体实现协同破坏。因此,结构充填开采中充填体间隔布置时,界面强度应高于相应的临界理论阈值,从而充分发挥顶底板岩层的承载能力。试验结果对提高“直接顶−充填体−直接底”复合承载结构稳定性具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract: In coal mine structural backfilling mining, arranging backfill at key goaf positions forms a "Backfill-Surrounding rock" synergistic bearing structure, effectively controlling surface subsidence and improving mining efficiency. Insufficient interface strength causes sliding and shear failure between backfill and surrounding rock, undermining “immediate roof-backfill-immediate floor” composites stability. To explore interface strength’s effect on the synergistic bearing and failure characteristics of the “immediate roof-backfill-immediate floor” composites, uniaxial compression tests were conducted on rock-backfill-rock composites with interface strength of 1.43~30.87 MPa, obtaining the variation laws of composites strength and elastic modulus with interface strength. Combined with DIC digital image correlation and acoustic emission(AE), the failure characteristics were accurately analyzed, and the synergistic failure mechanism was revealed by integrating interface mechanical properties and energy accumulation-loss characteristics. The test results show that composites strength and elastic modulus increase with interface strength. At 1.43 MPa, propagate laterally along the interface, and are mainly distributed in the backfill; At 5.69 MPa, high-energy AE events appear in sandstone, with AE energy and cumulative energy increase in order of magnitude; backfill cracks extend to sandstone through the interface after penetration, realizing synergistic failure, and this interface strength is lower than the backfill specimen strength 11.30 MPa. As interface strength increases from 1.43 to 30.87 MPa, dominant failure cracks transform from tensile to shear. Interface mechanical analysis indicates that above the critical threshold of 5.15 MPa, the maximum interface shear stress(5.61~17.70 MPa)is lower than the corresponding composites interface strength(5.69~30.87 MPa), avoiding sliding failure. The maximum interface compressive stress 11.41~12.26 MPa exceeds backfill specimen strength, restraining backfill damage; composites strength is dominated by backfill strength and assisted by interface shear stress, enabling synergistic bearing. Drucker-Prager strength criterion analysis shows that interface constraint weakens sandstone strength but enhances backfill strength; higher interface strength helps energy released by backfill failure reach sandstone’s energy storage limit. Energy analysis reveals that at 5.69~30.87 MPa, the composite’s energy storage limit(20.22~26.31 kJ·m−3)and peak dissipation ratio(0.20~0.26)both exceed those of the backfill specimen 20.15 kJ·m−3 and 0.17, with higher crack penetration degree and synergistic failure. In conclusion, spaced backfill arrangement in structural backfilling mining requires interface strength exceeding the critical threshold to give full play to the bearing capacity of roof and floor strata. The results are of great significance for improving the stability of the “immediate roof-backfill-immediate floor” composites bearing structure.

     

/

返回文章
返回