类孤岛工作面复采方案优选分析研究
Analysis study on selective preference of recovery mining project for island-like working face
-
摘要: 孤岛工作面是我国煤炭开采的一个技术难题，强矿压显现是孤岛工作面的重要特征，下石节煤矿类孤岛工作面因采动矿压显现剧烈而停采封面。为实现资源有益回收，延长矿井剩余服务年限，实现该类孤岛工作面安全复采，在综合现场调研、数值模拟计算以及理论分析等方法的基础上，总结分析了220工作面动压显现特征及其发生机制，提出了220工作面扩面和缩面2种改造方案，并综合对比评价了2种复采方案的动压、水、火、瓦斯防治的危险性以及经济效益情况。研究结果表明：220工作面动压显现与周期来压、顶板活动紧密相关，超高应力、上位多层厚硬岩层、宽煤柱以及频繁煤炮等综合作用是矿压剧烈显现的根源。确定了扩面改造(内错2301采空区15 m）、缩面改造(缩短50 m）为最优复采方案。综合对比2种复采方案的整体风险性以及经济效益情况建议：220工作面采用缩面50 m进行复采，安装简易机头、机尾单电机的综放推移方式，视情况再决定是否替换过渡支架以及安装正规机头和电机。Abstract: Island working face is a technical problem of coal mining in China,strong ground pressure behavior is significant characteristic of island working face,the island-like working face in Xiashijie Coal Mine stopped mining and closed working face due to strong mining pressure behavior. In order to realize the beneficial recycling of resources,extend the remaining service life of the mine,and realize the safe re-mining of the island-like working face,on the basis of comprehensive site survey,numerical simulation calculation and theoretical analysis,this paper summarizes and analyzes the dynamic pressure behavior characteristics and its mechanism of No.220 working face,and puts forward two kinds of transformation schemes of No.220 working face expansion and contraction.The results show that the dynamic pressure behavior of No.220 working face is closely related to periodic roof weighting and roof activity,and the comprehensive effects of super-high stress,upper multi-layer thick and hard rock,wide coal pillar and frequent coal blasting are the root of strong mining pressure behavior. The optimal re-mining schemes is determined as expanding face reconstruction(15 m in internal displacement Goaf 2301) and reducing face reconstruction(shorten by 50 m). By comprehensively comparing the overall risks and economic benefits of the two mining schemes,it is suggested that the fully mechanized top coal caving mining should be carried out in the No.220 working face with a reduced face of 50 m,and a simple machine head and a single motor at the tail should be installed,and whether to replace the transition support and install the regular machine head and electric machine should be decided according to the situation.
-
-
期刊类型引用(8)
1. 陈泽民，李振雷，钟涛平，宋大钊，刘旭东，胡旭聪. 急倾斜特厚煤层防冲开采方法数值模拟研究. 煤矿安全. 2025(01): 117-127 . 
百度学术
2. 侯挺，聂谦，薛兴伟. 弱化转移高水平应力技术在巷道修护中的研究与应用. 山东煤炭科技. 2025(01): 12-16 . 百度学术
3. 陈学亚，张宁波，刘立明，陈宝宝，付世雄. 遗留煤柱扰动下薄间距动压巷道压裂卸压护巷技术研究. 煤炭工程. 2025(01): 42-51 . 百度学术
4. 郭争利，杨真. 水力压裂防治强矿压机理及卸压护巷技术研究. 山西冶金. 2025(01): 204-206 . 百度学术
5. 龚惠春，夏广宁，杨生龙，刘鹏，杨龙. 深埋工作面回采巷道复合顶板水压致裂技术应用. 陕西煤炭. 2024(08): 90-94+140 . 百度学术
6. 赵会波. 水力压裂裂缝开裂压力影响因素分析及应用. 煤炭工程. 2024(09): 127-135 . 百度学术
7. 聂嘉汾，张海东. 不同切顶角度下临空巷道围岩力学响应特征及控制效果. 山西煤炭. 2024(04): 120-127 . 百度学术
8. 曹沛沛. 水力切顶卸压在动压巷道围岩控制中应用. 内蒙古煤炭经济. 2024(24): 160-162 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(1)
下载:
图(11)
计量
- 文章访问数: 275
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 542
- 被引次数: 9
