高级检索
王锋利. 矿井不同生产时期涌水量计算方法优选研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, (12).
引用本文: 王锋利. 矿井不同生产时期涌水量计算方法优选研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, (12).
WANG Fengli. Study on optimization of mine water inflow calculation methods in different production periods[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (12).
Citation: WANG Fengli. Study on optimization of mine water inflow calculation methods in different production periods[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (12).

矿井不同生产时期涌水量计算方法优选研究

Study on optimization of mine water inflow calculation methods in different production periods

  • 摘要: 基于矿井涌水量计算方法众多,每种方法都有其特有的应用局限性,为了在矿井服务年限内不同时期合理选择精度较高的涌水量计算方法,以大同煤田北区塔山、东周窑、马脊梁、燕子山、四台及同忻6对矿井为例,选取在生产矿井中参数容易采集的、计算易于掌握的水文地质比拟法、相关分析法和解析法对各矿井涌水量计算方法进行并分析对比。研究结果表明:①矿井勘查期, 此时井田内无实测涌水量资料,水文地质参数尚未查明,利用相同矿区邻近矿井涌水量资料采用水文地质比拟法进行预测预测精度高;②矿井设计、基建阶段,涌水量计算为井筒建设和大巷开拓服务,以马脊梁矿为例,解析法计算矿井涌水量相对误差仅为19.77%,采用水文地质比拟法相对误差为36.20%。因此,该阶段涌水量计算适宜采用解析法进行预测;③燕子山矿为试产矿井,相关分析法计算矿井涌水量相对误差为3.56%,而采用解析法计算相对误差达到28%以上,该阶段采用相关分析法预测矿井涌水量更为可靠。④塔山和同忻煤矿均已达产,通过对比分析,该阶段矿井涌水量采用水文地质比拟法计算相对误差均在20%以内。因此,在矿井稳定生产阶段,此时,采用吨煤富水系数或产能类比的水文地质比拟法计算简单明了,且预测精度较高。

     

    Abstract: There were numerous methods to calculate the mine water inflow rate, and each method has its application limitation. In order to choose a reasonable and accurate calculation method of water inflow in different stages of mine service life,six coal mines which located in northern part of Datong coalfield including Tashan, Dongzhouyao, Majiliang, Yanzishan, Sitai and Tongxi mines are taken as research examples. The hydro-geological comparison method, correlation analysis method and analytical method with easy-to-collect parameters and easy-to-understand calculations were selected to calculate the water inflow from each mine. The research results show that: ①In the mine exploration stage, there is no measured water inflow data in the field,and hydro-geological parameters have not yet been determined. But using hydro-geological analogy method to make predictions by using water inflow data from adjacent mines in the same mining area can improve prediction accuracy;②During the mine design and infrastructure construction stage, the mine water inflow volume is calculated to serve the construction of the shaft and the roadway.Such as Majiliang Mine,the relative error of the analytical method to calculate the water inflow volume is only 19.77% and the relative error of the hydro-geological analogy method is 36.20%. Therefore, the calculation of water inflow at this stage is suitable to use the analytical method to predict the hydro-geological parameters found in the proposed well-bore and the first mining area;③Yanzishan Mine is a trial production mine, the relative error of the calculation method is 3.56%, and the relative error calculated by the analytical method reaches more than 28%. So the correlation analysis method, is more reliable to predict the mine water inflow.④Both Tashan Mine and Tongxin Mine have reached production. Through comparative analysis, the relative errors of mine water inflow volume calculated using the hydro-geological analogy method are within 20%. Therefore, in stable production stage, the hydro-geological analogy method using the water-rich coefficient per ton of coal is simple and clear, and the prediction accuracy is also high.

     

/

返回文章
返回