高级检索
王维旭, 贺满江, 王希友, 蒋佩, 彭丽莎, 杜悦. 筠连区块煤层气产能主控因素分析及综合评价[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017, (9).
引用本文: 王维旭, 贺满江, 王希友, 蒋佩, 彭丽莎, 杜悦. 筠连区块煤层气产能主控因素分析及综合评价[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017, (9).
WANG Weixu HE Manjiang WANG Xiyou JIANG Pei PENG Lisha DU Yue, . Analysis on main controlling factors and comprehensive evaluation of coalbed methane production capacity of Junlian Block[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (9).
Citation: WANG Weixu HE Manjiang WANG Xiyou JIANG Pei PENG Lisha DU Yue, . Analysis on main controlling factors and comprehensive evaluation of coalbed methane production capacity of Junlian Block[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, (9).

筠连区块煤层气产能主控因素分析及综合评价

Analysis on main controlling factors and comprehensive evaluation of coalbed methane production capacity of Junlian Block

  • 摘要: 四川南部地区煤层气资源量丰富,为精细评价该区域煤层产气潜力,以筠连区块为研究对象,选取65口进入稳产期的生产井数据,综合地质、工程参数,展开产能主控因素研究。选取地质因素和压裂效果2项一级指标、以及下属7项二级指标建立煤层气井综合评价体系,采用类比法和灰色关联法相结合的方式确定一、二级指标的权重,并运用基于2级权重的多层次多目标模糊优选法进行气井综合评价。研究结果表明:对区内110口稳产井进行验证,气井评分与实际产气能力吻合度高,综合评分大于85分为高产井,75~85分为中产井,低于75分的产气效果较差,同时该评价方法还可用于气井产量预测、有利区域划分等,为本区块煤层气开发后评价工作和开发技术政策调整提供决策。

     

    Abstract: In order to accurately evaluate the coalbed methane production capacity in southern Sichuan region where is abundant of coalbed methane resources, r ain controlling factors of capacity were analyzed based onstable production period data from 65 producing wells in Julian Block. Coalbed methane comprehensive evalu ation system was established formed by seven subordinate indicators and two first grade indicators which include geological factor and fracturing effect. Weight factors of indicators were calculated by analogy method and grey correction analysis. Fuzzy optimization method based on two grades weight factors was applied for gas well C omprehensive evaluation. Evaluation results which had good agreement with actual productivities were verified by 110 stable producing wells. Wells with scores greater than85 were divided as high production wells, wells with scores between 75 and 85 were divided as middle yield wells, wells with scoresless than 75 had poor productio n effect.The comprehensive evaluation method also can be used for productivity prediction, favorable target area optimization, post evaluation of coalbed methane expl oitation and technology policy adjustment.

     

/

返回文章
返回