高级检索

蒙东典型大型露天矿生态储存指标体系及过程分析——以宝矿、 敏矿、 胜利矿为例

赵玉国, 吉 莉, 董霁红, 房阿曼, 曹志国, 张 峰

赵玉国, 吉 莉, 董霁红, 房阿曼, 曹志国, 张 峰. 蒙东典型大型露天矿生态储存指标体系及过程分析——以宝矿、 敏矿、 胜利矿为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(5).
引用本文: 赵玉国, 吉 莉, 董霁红, 房阿曼, 曹志国, 张 峰. 蒙东典型大型露天矿生态储存指标体系及过程分析——以宝矿、 敏矿、 胜利矿为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(5).
ZHAO Yuguo, JI Li, DONG Jihong, FANG Aman, CAO Zhiguo, ZHANG Feng. Analysis of index system and state of ecological storage of typical large open-pit mines in Eastern Inner Mongolia:taking Baorixile,Yinmin and Shengli No.1 Open-Pit Coal Mine as examples[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(5).
Citation: ZHAO Yuguo, JI Li, DONG Jihong, FANG Aman, CAO Zhiguo, ZHANG Feng. Analysis of index system and state of ecological storage of typical large open-pit mines in Eastern Inner Mongolia:taking Baorixile,Yinmin and Shengli No.1 Open-Pit Coal Mine as examples[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(5).

蒙东典型大型露天矿生态储存指标体系及过程分析——以宝矿、 敏矿、 胜利矿为例

Analysis of index system and state of ecological storage of typical large open-pit mines in Eastern Inner Mongolia:taking Baorixile,Yinmin and Shengli No.1 Open-Pit Coal Mine as examples

Funds: 

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0501105); National Natural Science Foundation of China (51874306)

  • 摘要: 为研究草原矿区不同开采时期的生态状况,选取自然条件及开采现状较为相似的、具有不同开采年份的3个大型露天矿宝日希勒露天矿(20 a)、伊敏露天矿(36 a)、胜利一号露天矿(45 a),在初步划定各矿区生态敏感区的基础上,基于生态服务价值分析,结合生态储存状态、过程、能力、格局及条件指标,综合评价对比各矿区的生态储存效应。研究结果表明:① 宝矿、敏矿、胜利矿矿区生态服务价值变化幅度分别为-4 212.19、1 915.68、-2 491.49元/a;生态储存状态指标显示,宝矿、敏矿、胜利矿的矿区生态系统单位面积生态服务价值分别以83.68、75.38、48.01元/(hm2·a)的速度发生退化。② 三个矿生态储存转化率均为负值,生态系统呈现高服务功能向低服务功能转换的过程,生态储存过程均呈现消极转化趋势;宝矿、敏矿、胜利矿生态储存能力值分别为-410、-310、-240元/(hm2·a),其中胜利矿具有相对较好的生态储存能力;三个矿的生态储存格局值较为接近,宝矿、敏矿、胜利矿生态储存条件值分别为0.37%、0.69%、0.62%。③ 生态储存效应综合指数显示,敏矿综合指数相对较高为4.37,宝矿次之、胜利矿相对较低为1.65,表明土地利用对区域生态储存影响伊敏矿最小,胜利矿最大。研究结果有利于及时采取应对措施以减缓矿区生态效应的累积趋势,促进煤炭开采与草原生态的协调发展。
    Abstract: In order to study the ecological status of grassland mining area in different mining periods,three large-scale open-pit mines with similar natural conditions and mining status,including the Baorixile Open-pit Mine (20 years),Yimin Open-pit Mine (36 years),and Shengli No.1 Open-pit Mine (45 years),with different mining years were selected. On the basis of the preliminary delineation of the ecologically sensitive areas in each mining area,the ecological service value analysis and the ecological storage state,process,capacity,pattern and condition indexes were used to comprehensively evaluate and compare the ecological storage effects of each mining area. The results showed that:① the variation range of ecological service value in 〖JP2〗Baorixile,Yimin and Shengli No 1 mining areas was -4 212.19,1 915.68 and -2 491.49 yuan /a,respectively. According to the ecological storage status index,the ecological service value per unit area of the mining area ecosystem of Baorixile,Yimin and Shengli No.1 open pit coal mine was degraded at a rate of 83.68,75.38 and 48.01 yuan/(hm2·a),respectively. ② The conversion rate of ecological storage in the three mines was negative,the ecosystem showed a process of conversion from high service function to low service function,and the ecological storage process showed a negative trend. The ecological storage capacity values of Baorixile,Yimin and Shengli No 1 open pit coal mine are -410,-310 yuan/(hm2·a) and -240 yuan/(hm2·a),respectively,among which Shengli No 1 mine had relatively good ecological storage capacity. The ecological storage pattern values of the three mines were close to each other. The ecological storage conditions of Baorixile,Yimin and Shengli No 1 open pit coal mine were 0.37%,0.69% and 0.62%,respectively. ③ The comprehensive index of ecological storage effect showed that the comprehensive index of Yimin mine was relatively high at 4.37,followed by Baorixile mine,and Shengli No 1 mine was relatively low〖JP〗 at 1.65,indicating that land use had the least impact on regional ecological storage of Yimin mine and the largest impact on Shengli mine. The results are helpful to take measures to slow down the accumulation of ecological effects in mining areas and promote the coordinated development of coal mining and grassland ecology.
  • 期刊类型引用(15)

    1. 焦建英,吕春颖,邵暖,张贺玉,张翔,武智瑛. 基于C#+PLC煤矿边缘监测AI控制研究. 煤炭技术. 2025(04): 235-238 . 百度学术
    2. 王昕彤. 基于大数据和人工智能的矿山安全预警与监控. 信息与电脑(理论版). 2024(01): 202-204 . 百度学术
    3. 郝守礼,乔燕军,范科,赵文韬,丁洒. 光伏发电区红外热成像火灾预警系统研究. 信息与电脑(理论版). 2024(05): 59-61 . 百度学术
    4. 田佳伟,唐子山. 基于边缘计算和ST-YOLO的矿井智能监控技术研究. 煤炭工程. 2024(07): 165-173 . 百度学术
    5. 都书刚,戴万波,马旭伟,康舆哲. 智能矿山IoT边缘数据网关技术研究. 矿冶. 2024(04): 631-636 . 百度学术
    6. 张婧,周浩,屈世甲,赵乾坤. 工作面煤壁甲烷涌出在受限空间的扩散规律研究. 煤炭技术. 2024(10): 135-141 . 百度学术
    7. 张婧,张桓瑞,赵乾坤,屈世甲. 综采工作面区域甲烷分布特征及关键监测位置研究. 中国矿业. 2024(10): 209-216 . 百度学术
    8. 崔林林,权晓光,徐昊,仝依良,王晓彬. 基于Azure边云结合在煤矿安全方向应用研究. 传感器与微系统. 2024(12): 37-40 . 百度学术
    9. 王健,屈世甲,于振,张羽. 煤矿地下水库安全监测及预警关键技术研究. 中国煤炭. 2024(12): 71-82 . 百度学术
    10. 安军. 基于无线通信技术的电气火灾智能监控系统. 自动化与仪表. 2023(01): 120-124 . 百度学术
    11. 程德强,钱建生,郭星歌,寇旗旗,徐飞翔,顾军,高亚超,赵金升. 煤矿安全生产视频AI识别关键技术研究综述. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(02): 349-365 . 本站查看
    12. 杨波. 基于大数据分析的煤矿通风自动控制系统. 能源与环保. 2023(08): 39-44 . 百度学术
    13. 李伟,叶鸥,刘辉,黄天尘. 基于数字孪生技术的大型煤矿远程智能监控研究. 计算机测量与控制. 2023(11): 204-211 . 百度学术
    14. 刘辉,张晓利,黄天尘,赵堃. 基于改进RBF数据融合算法的煤矿井下安全监控研究. 计算机测量与控制. 2023(11): 173-180 . 百度学术
    15. 蔡勇. 煤矿安全监测监控系统在应用中存在的问题及解决措施分析. 内蒙古煤炭经济. 2022(24): 94-96 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  64
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
  • PDF下载量:  2901
  • 被引次数: 18
出版历程
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-02
  • 发布日期:  2022-05-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回