Citation: | CHEN Meinan,DING Zhongyi,HOU Huping,et al. Analysis on spatial heterogeneity of ecological restoration demand in resource-based cities: taking Jiawang District of Xuzhou city as an example[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(12):278−286. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.ST21-001 |
After a long period of coal resource exploitation in resource-based cities, the imbalance and disharmony between resource development and ecological protection in coal mining areas are prominent. In the context of ecological civilization construction, clarifying the spatial heterogeneity of ecological restoration needs and reasonably arranging the priority of ecological restoration work will become the basic work for efficient and coordinated ecological protection and restoration, which will help to plan as a whole, coordinate and orderly promote the high-quality sustainable development of resource-based cities. From the comprehensive perspective of the coordinated development of ecosystem and human well-being, Jiawang District, Xuzhou City, was selected as an example, and the historical remote sensing images, historical mine information and social and economic statistics in 2000, 2010 and 2019 were taken as the data sources. The equivalent assignment method was used to calculate the regional ecosystem service value and make coefficient correction. The landscape ecological risk assessment system was constructed by integrating the topographic location index, mining area disturbance index and landscape vulnerability index. The spatial and temporal patterns of ecosystem service value and ecological risk index in the study area were analyzed, and the sharpe ratio was introduced to further explore the spatial heterogeneity of ecological restoration needs. The results showed that: ① From 2000 to 2019, the total value of ecosystem services in Jiawang district increased first and then decreased, and the value of ecological risk index decreased first and then increased. The growth rate was relatively flat, showing a small range; the spatial distribution of ecological service value and ecological risk level shows a trend of overall connectivity, with local circles moving outward. Urbanization and coal mining subsidence land management are the main factors influencing the spatial pattern differentiation. ② At the quantitative level, the ecosystem service value per unit area and the ecological risk index have strong negative grade correlations, but there is no obvious functional relationship; At the spatial level, the overall Moran’s I index of unit ecosystem service value and ecological risk index in Jiawang District from 2000 to 2019 were negative, showing negative spatial correlation. Ecological risks and ecosystem services have obvious dislocation characteristics. ③ The heterogeneity index R of ecological restoration demand in Jiawang district presents a gradient spatial change trend to a certain extent, and the overall ecological restoration demand tends to decrease, but the R index is still too high or too low in some regions; with the increase of degree of deviation, the range of high value areas for ecological restoration needs gradually narrowed and transformed to low value areas, and the areas requiring key ecological construction tend to be more centralized. The research conclusion can provide reference for the decision-making arrangement of systematic and integrated ecological restoration of resource exhausted cities.
[1] |
卢 硕,张文忠,余建辉,等. 资源型城市演化阶段识别及其发展特征[J]. 地理学报,2020,75(10):2180−2191. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202010010
LU Shuo,ZHANG Wenzhong,YU Jianhui,et al. The identification of spatial evolution stage of resource-based cities and its development characteristics[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2020,75(10):2180−2191. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202010010
|
[2] |
谢丽霞,白永平,车 磊,等. 基于价值—风险的黄河上游生态功能区生态分区建设[J]. 自然资源学报,2021,36(1):196−207. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210113
XIE Lixia,BAI Yongping,CHE Lei,et al. Construction of ecological zone based on value-risk ecological function area in the Upper Yellow River[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2021,36(1):196−207. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210113
|
[3] |
胡振琪,肖 武. 关于煤炭工业绿色发展战略的若干思考:基于生态修复视角[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2020,48(4):35−42. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2020.04.002
HU Zhenqi,XIAO Wu. Some thoughts on green development strategy of coal industry: from aspects of ecological restoration[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2020,48(4):35−42. doi: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2020.04.002
|
[4] |
卞正富,雷少刚,金 丹,等. 矿区土地修复的几个基本问题[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(1):190−197. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.4004
BIAN Zhengfu,LEI Shaogang,JIN Dan,et al. Several basic scientific issues related to mined land remediation[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(1):190−197. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.4004
|
[5] |
傅伯杰. 国土空间生态修复亟待把握的几个要点[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2021,36(1):64−69. doi: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20201222001
FU Bojie. Several key points in territorial ecological restoration[J]. Strategy & Policy Decision Research,2021,36(1):64−69. doi: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20201222001
|
[6] |
曹 宇,王嘉怡,李国煜. 国土空间生态修复: 概念思辨与理论认知[J]. 中国土地科学,2019,33(7):1−10.
CAO Yu,WANG Jiayi,LI Guoyu. Ecological restoration for territorial space: basic concepts and foundations[J]. China Land Science,2019,33(7):1−10.
|
[7] |
熊 文,孙晓玉,黄 羽. 城市静态小水体生态修复措施与生态服务价值评估研究[J]. 水生态学杂志,2020,41(2):29−35. doi: 10.15928/j.1674-3075.2020.02.005
XIONG Wen,SUN Xiaoyu,HUANG Yu. Assessment of an ecosystem restoration project and evaluation of ecosystem services for a small urban lake in Wuhan, China[J]. Journal of Hydroecology,2020,41(2):29−35. doi: 10.15928/j.1674-3075.2020.02.005
|
[8] |
XUE Zhijing,CHENG Man,AN Shaoshan. Soil nitrogen distributions for different land uses and landscape positions in a small watershed on Loess Plateau, China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2013,60(5):204−213.
|
[9] |
ZHOU Yuanyuan,FU Dongjie,LU Chunxia,et al. Positive effects of ecological restoration policies on the vegetation dynamics in a typical ecologically vulnerable area of China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2021,159(5):106087.
|
[10] |
TAN Puay Yok,ZHANG Jingyuan,MASOUDI Mahyar,et al. A conceptual framework to untangle the concept of urban ecosystem services[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2020,200(5):103837.
|
[11] |
王 军,钟莉娜. 生态系统服务理论与山水林田湖草生态保护修复的应用[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(23):8702−8708.
WANG Jun,ZHONG Lina. Application of ecosystem service theory for ecological protection and restoration of mountain-river-forest-field-lake-grassland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(23):8702−8708.
|
[12] |
白中科,师学义,周 伟,等. 人工如何支持引导生态系统自然修复[J]. 中国土地科学,2020,34(9):1−9. doi: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20200918.123606
BAI Zhongke,SHI Xueyi,ZHOU Wei,et al. How does artificiality support and guide the natural restoration of ecosystems[J]. China Land Science,2020,34(9):1−9. doi: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20200918.123606
|
[13] |
彭 建,吕丹娜,董建权,等. 过程耦合与空间集成: 国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(1):3−13. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102
PENG Jian,LYU Danna,DONG Jianquan,et al. Processes coupling and spatial integration: characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(1):3−13. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102
|
[14] |
陈新闯,李小倩,吕一河,等. 区域尺度生态修复空间辨识研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(23):8717−8724.
CHEN Xinchuang,LI Xiaoqian,LV Yihe,et al. Review of spatial identification of ecological restoration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(23):8717−8724.
|
[15] |
宫清华,叶玉瑶,王 钧,等. 粤港澳大湾区防灾韧性空间规划策略研究[J]. 规划师,2021,37(3):22−27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2021.03.003
GONG Qinghua,YE Yuyao,WANG Jun,et al. Resilient disaster prevention space planning of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area[J]. Planners,2021,37(3):22−27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2021.03.003
|
[16] |
卞正富,于昊辰,雷少刚,等. 黄河流域煤炭资源开发战略研判与生态修复策略思考[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(5):1378−1391. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.ST21.0249
BIAN Zhengfu,YU Haochen,LEI Shaogang,et al. Strategic consideration of exploitation on coal resources and its ecological restoration in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(5):1378−1391. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.ST21.0249
|
[17] |
白中科. 资源型城市城镇化进程及生态整治路径研究[J]. 中国土地,2017(7):17−19. doi: 10.13816/j.cnki.cn11-1351/f.2017.07.006
BAI Zhongke. Research on the urbanization process and ecological improvement path of resource-based cities[J]. China Land,2017(7):17−19. doi: 10.13816/j.cnki.cn11-1351/f.2017.07.006
|
[18] |
曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,等. 景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架: ESRISK[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(5):843−855. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201805005
CAO Qiwen,ZHANG Xiwen,MA Hongkun,et al. Review of landscape ecological risk and an assessment framework based on ecological services: ESRISK[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2018,73(5):843−855. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201805005
|
[19] |
李俊翰,高明秀. 滨州市生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空演变及其关联性[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(21):7815−7828.
LI Junhan,GAO Mingxiu. Spatiotemporal evolution and correlation analysis of ecosystem service values and ecological risk in Binzhou[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(21):7815−7828.
|
[20] |
王慧芳,林子雁,肖 燚,等. 基于生态系统服务潜在损失的滑坡灾害生态风险评价[J]. 应用生态学报,2019,30(10):3553−3562. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201910.019
WANG Huifang,LIN Ziyan,XIAO Yi,et al. Ecological risk assessment of landslide disasters based on potential loss of ecosystem services[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2019,30(10):3553−3562. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201910.019
|
[21] |
刘世梁,侯笑云,张月秋,等. 基于生态系统服务的土地整治生态风险评价与管控建议[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2017,33(3):193−200. doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2017.03.001
LIU Shiliang,HOU Xiaoyun,ZHANG Yueqiu,et al. Assessment of and controlling strategies for ecological risks of land consolidation based on ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2017,33(3):193−200. doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2017.03.001
|
[22] |
蒋 蕾,杜明月. 基于生态系统服务的农安县景观生态风险评价[J]. 环境生态学,2019,1(3):39−45.
JIANG Lei,DU Mingyue. Landscape ecological risk assessment based on ecosystem services of Nong'an County[J]. Environmental Ecology,2019,1(3):39−45.
|
[23] |
陈 峰,李红波,张安录. 基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价[J]. 地理学报,2019,74(3):432−445. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201903003
CHEN Feng,LI Hongbo,ZHANG Anlu. Ecological risk assessment based on terrestrial ecosystem services in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica,2019,74(3):432−445. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201903003
|
[24] |
蔡海生,陈 艺,查东平,等. 基于主导功能的国土空间生态修复分区的原理与方法[J]. 农业工程学报,2020,36(15):261−270. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.15.032
CAI Haisheng,CHEN Yi,ZHA Dongping,et al. Principle and method for ecological restoration zoning of territorial space based on the dominant function[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(15):261−270. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.15.032
|
[25] |
KHOSHKAR Sara,HAMMER Monica,BORGSTRÖM Sara,et al. Moving from vision to action-integrating ecosystem services in the Swedish local planning context[J]. Land Use Policy,2020,97(5):104791.
|
[26] |
陈春丽,吕永龙,王铁宇,等. 区域生态风险评价的关键问题与展望[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(3):808−816.
CHEN Chunli,LYU Yonglong,WANG Tieyu,et al. Emerging issues and prospects for regional ecological risk assessment[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(3):808−816.
|
[27] |
谢余初,张素欣,林 冰,等. 基于生态系统服务供需关系的广西县域国土生态修复空间分区[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(1):217−229. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200118
XIE Yuchu,ZHANG Suxin,LIN Bing,et al. Spatial zoning for land ecological consolidation in Guangxi based on the ecosystem services supply and demand[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(1):217−229. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200118
|
[28] |
胡振琪. 我国土地复垦与生态修复30年: 回顾、反思与展望[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2019,47(1):25−35.
HU Zhenqi. The 30 years'land reclamation and ecological restoration in China: review, rethinking and prospect[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2019,47(1):25−35.
|
[29] |
倪庆琳,侯湖平,丁忠义,等. 基于生态安全格局识别的国土空间生态修复分区:以徐州市贾汪区为例[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(1):204−216. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200117
NI Qinglin,HOU Huping,DING Zhongyi,et al. Ecological remediation zoning of territory based on the ecological security pattern recognition: taking Jiawang District of Xuzhou City as an example[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(1):204−216. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200117
|
[30] |
COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253−260.
|
[31] |
谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等. 中国生态系统服务的价值[J]. 资源科学,2015,37(9):1740−1746.
XIE Gaodi,ZHANG Caixia,ZHANG Changshun,et al. The value of ecosystem services in China[J]. Resources Science,2015,37(9):1740−1746.
|
[32] |
杜腾飞,齐 伟,朱西存,等. 基于生态安全格局的山地丘陵区自然资源空间精准识别与管制方法[J]. 自然资源学报,2020,35(5):1190−1200. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200514
DU Tengfei,QI Wei,ZHU Xicun,et al. Precise identification and control method of natural resources space based on ecological security pattern in mountainous hilly area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2020,35(5):1190−1200. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200514
|
[33] |
LI Sucui,XIAO Wu,ZHAO Yanling,et al. Incorporating ecological risk index in the multi-process MCRE model to optimize the ecological security pattern in a semi-arid area with intensive coal mining: A case study in northern China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,247:119143. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119143
|
[34] |
吴健生,宗敏丽,彭 建. 基于景观格局的矿区生态脆弱性评价:以吉林省辽源市为例[J]. 生态学杂志,2012,31(12):3213−3220. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2012.0418
WU Jiansheng,ZONG Minli,PENG Jian. Assessment of mining area's ecological vulnerability based on landscape pattern: a case study of Liaoyuan, Jilin Province of Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2012,31(12):3213−3220. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2012.0418
|
[35] |
李保杰,顾和和,纪亚洲. 复垦矿区生态系统服务价值空间分异研究:以徐州市贾汪矿区为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2014,43(4):749−756. doi: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.000168
LI Baojie,GU Hehe,JI Yazhou. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem service value of reclaimed land in mining area: A case study of Jiawang Mining Area in Xuzhou City[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2014,43(4):749−756. doi: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.000168
|
[36] |
XING Lu,HU Mingsheng,WANG Yi. Integrating ecosystem services value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment: a case study of Hubei Province, central China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,740(5):140126.
|
[37] |
HANSEN Bruce E. Sample splitting and threshold estimation[J]. Econometrica,2000,68(3):575−603. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00124
|
1. |
束振宇,徐祥,魏迎春,王安民,王路,刘志飞,陈高建,曹代勇. 不同类型接触变质煤大分子结构差异性研究. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(06): 147-157 .
![]() |