Advance Search
Issue 5
May  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Yongjian, PAN Jianxu, LIU Xianwei. Study on comprehensive evaluation of low permeability sandstone reservoirs ofcoal-derived gas in Huaibei Coalfield[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (5).
Citation: WANG Yongjian, PAN Jianxu, LIU Xianwei. Study on comprehensive evaluation of low permeability sandstone reservoirs ofcoal-derived gas in Huaibei Coalfield[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (5).

Study on comprehensive evaluation of low permeability sandstone reservoirs ofcoal-derived gas in Huaibei Coalfield

More Information
  • Available Online: April 02, 2023
  • Published Date: May 24, 2019
  • Coal-derived gas is an important supplement to natural gas resources. The Huaibei Coalfield is rich in coal-derived gas resources and has great exploration potential. However, the study of low permeability sandstone reservoirs is limited, and there is also less reservoir evaluation. In order to effectively evaluate sandstone low-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs of Shanxi Formation, Lower Shihezi Formation and Upper Shihezi Formation in Huaibei Coalfield, the sedimentary facies, pore permeability characteristics, pore structure, pore types and diagenesis were comprehensively evaluated by means of pore permeability test, rock slice analysis and scanning electron microscope. The results show that from the perspective of pore permeability and pore structure, the Upper Shihezi Formation is the best, followed by the Shanxi Formation, and the Lower Shihezi Formation is poor. From the perspective of the degree and type of pore development, the Upper Shihezi Formation has the most developed pores, mainly primary pore and secondary dissolution pore, followed by Shanxi Formation, mainly secondary dissolution pore, while the Lower Shihezi Formation has poor pore development. Comprehensive evaluation shows that sandstone reservoirs in Upper Shihezi Formation have the best development. Type Ⅰ reservoirs account for 22.65%, Type Ⅱ reservoirs account for 50.32%, and Type Ⅲ reservoirs represent 27.03%;This was followed by Shanxi sandstone reservoirs, where Type I reservoirs account for 21.7%, Type Ⅱ reservoirs account for 42.05%, and Type Ⅲ reservoirs shares another 36.25%; The sandstone reservoir of Lower Shihezi Formation is poorer, with Type Ⅰ reservoir accounting for 2.91%, Type Ⅱ reservoir accounting for 38.85%, and Type Ⅲ reservoir accounting for 58.24%.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 郭昆明. ?200 mm定向高位大直径一次成孔工艺技术的应用. 能源与环保. 2025(02): 31-35+41 .
    2. 张占强. BLY1000/16型煤矿井下钻探用泥浆泵车设计. 煤矿机械. 2024(07): 5-7 .
    3. 陈超,陈天柱,张马军,王常委. 孤岛工作面碎软煤层跟管护孔钻进工艺研究. 工矿自动化. 2023(01): 73-79 .
    4. 段会军. 复杂顶板岩层大直径高位定向钻孔装备与技术. 煤炭技术. 2023(07): 112-115 .
    5. 段会军. 软硬互层顶板大直径定向钻孔成孔技术研究. 中国煤炭地质. 2023(10): 47-51 .
    6. 刘见中. 强化科技创新推动煤炭行业高质量发展研究. 中国煤炭. 2022(04): 1-7 .
    7. 冷明友. 顶板大直径定向钻孔快速施工技术研究. 矿山机械. 2022(07): 8-11 .
    8. 唐敏. 自动钻机集群作业线在Ⅲ1022底抽巷的研究与应用. 煤炭技术. 2022(08): 115-118 .
    9. 陶云奇,张剑钊,郭明功,于红,潘仁杰. 采动卸压瓦斯抽采以孔代巷技术研究与工程实践. 矿业安全与环保. 2022(05): 43-48 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(9)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return