高级检索

采煤沉陷区建筑地基稳定性分析方法对比研究

李宇宸, 朱晓峻, 刘辉

李宇宸, 朱晓峻, 刘辉. 采煤沉陷区建筑地基稳定性分析方法对比研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(4): 229-235.
引用本文: 李宇宸, 朱晓峻, 刘辉. 采煤沉陷区建筑地基稳定性分析方法对比研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(4): 229-235.
LI Yuchen, ZHU Xiaojun, LIU Hui. Comparative study on stability analysis method of building foundation in coal mining subsidence area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(4): 229-235.
Citation: LI Yuchen, ZHU Xiaojun, LIU Hui. Comparative study on stability analysis method of building foundation in coal mining subsidence area[J]. COAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50(4): 229-235.

采煤沉陷区建筑地基稳定性分析方法对比研究

Comparative study on stability analysis method of building foundation in coal mining subsidence area

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China (51804001); Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1808085QE147); Key Funding Project for Natural Science Research in Universities of Anhui Province (KJ2018A0003)

  • 摘要:

    近年采煤沉陷区土地被广泛用作建设用地,建筑地基的稳定性直接决定沉陷区新建建筑物的可行性,而稳定性分析方法的选取是建筑地基稳定性分析的重要一环。为筛选出适用于采煤沉陷区建筑地基稳定性分析的最优方法,以淮北中湖采煤沉陷区为研究对象,针对沉陷区新建建筑物的地基稳定性分析问题,探讨了影响地基稳定性的主要因素,总结了地基稳定的评价标准,分别使用概率积分法、力学解析法和经验公式法对研究区地基进行了稳定性分析,并综合分析过程中的工作量、准确性、适用条件和模型构建因素对各方法进行了对比分析,指出了采煤沉陷区建筑地基稳定性分析的最适方法。研究表明:经验公式法在实际的地基稳定性分析中工作量小、准确性高、适用性强,模型可调性高,更适用于采煤沉陷区建筑地基稳定性分析的实际工程应用,力学解析法其次,概率积分法再次;概率积分法、力学解析法和经验公式法对研究区的地基稳定性评价结果与工程实际基本一致,研究区地基处于稳定状态;概率积分法实现了研究区未来十年的地表残余变形预计,今后研究区仍处于缓慢移动的状态,最大残余下沉量441 mm,最大残余倾斜1.6 mm/m,最大残余曲率0.02 mm/m2,最大残余水平变形1.5 mm/m,最大残余水平移动110 mm。

    Abstract:

    In recent years, the land in coal mining subsidence areas has been widely used as construction land.The stability of the building foundation directly determines the feasibility of new buildings in the subsidence area, and the selection of foundation stability analysis methods is an important part of the foundation stability analysis of the building foundation. In order to screen out the optimal method for the stability analysis of the building foundation in the coal mining subsidence area, this paper took the Huaibei Zhonghu coal mining subsidence area as the research object, and discussed the influence of the foundation stability of the newly built buildings in the subsidence area. Based on the main factors of stability, the evaluation criteria of foundation stability were summarized, and probability integral method, mechanical analysis method and empirical formula method were used to evaluate the foundation stability of the study area, and the workload, accuracy and applicable conditions in the comprehensive analysis process were comprehensively analyzed. The methods were compared and analyzed with the model construction factors, and the most suitable method for the stability analysis of building foundation in coal mining subsidence area was pointed out. The research shows that the empirical formula method has small workload, high accuracy, strong applicability, and high model adjust ability in the actual foundation stability analysis. It is more suitable for practical engineering applications of building foundation stability analysis in coal mining subsidence areas. The analytical method was followed by the probability integration method; the evaluation results of the foundation stability of the research area by the probability integration method, the mechanical analytical method and empirical formula method were basically consistent with the engineering reality, and the foundation of the research area was in a stable state; the probability integration method realizes the future of the study area.The ten-year residual surface deformation is expected to be in a slow-moving state in the future, with a maximum residual subsidence of 441 mm, a maximum residual slope of 1.6 mm/m, a maximum residual curvature of 0.02 mm/m2, and a maximum residual horizontal deformation of 1.5 mm/m. The maximum residual horizontal movement is 110 mm.

  • 期刊类型引用(12)

    1. 李宏业,杨亚平,雒焕祯,张席芝,史铭,王刚,陈勋. 深部大断面硐室开挖顺序及支护参数优化. 黄金. 2025(01): 75-81 . 百度学术
    2. 臧金诚,李东浩,张鲁,孙凌锋,黄玉兵. 深部硐室群开挖次序优化方法研究. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(02): 10-18 . 百度学术
    3. 张运海,经来旺,方旭,高明中. 深埋煤层巷道岔点支护形式安全稳定性分析. 煤炭技术. 2024(05): 70-75 . 百度学术
    4. 陈蓥,杨宏涛,史明哲,鲍世纪,张子凯,孔德瑞. 乌兰木伦煤矿大断面硐室围岩变形破坏规律及控制. 工矿自动化. 2024(08): 52-60 . 百度学术
    5. 刘震宇,唐彬,胡阳,张大欢,徐彬,侯俊领. 煤矿深部复合地层TBM掘进巷道围岩稳定性控制工程实践. 科技资讯. 2024(16): 191-196 . 百度学术
    6. 贾住平,郑禄璟,金开玥,郑禄林,荣鹏. 超大断面破碎软岩硐室围岩稳定性及控制技术研究. 黄金. 2024(09): 1-7 . 百度学术
    7. 王玺,刘兴全,李正灿,梁伟章,刘震,武志明. 基于岩体质量分级的某金矿深部采场支护技术研究. 金属矿山. 2024(09): 19-25 . 百度学术
    8. 李月轩,邵军,胡忻元. 煤矿井巷支护关键参数确定及快速掘进工艺优化研究. 能源与节能. 2024(11): 146-149 . 百度学术
    9. 谢妞妞. 矩形巷道锚杆支护优化数值模拟分析研究. 煤炭技术. 2023(10): 82-85 . 百度学术
    10. 胡阳,毛安,徐彬,王洪涛,李天国,刘震宇,张风林,唐彬. 煤矿深部地层TBM组装硐室支护优化设计. 科技资讯. 2023(22): 195-198 . 百度学术
    11. 李安云,张凯,徐金峰,谢雄耀,康元锋. 破碎软岩斜井TBM开挖围岩稳定性及支护优化研究——以可可盖副斜井TBM掘进工程为例. 隧道建设(中英文). 2023(11): 1924-1934 . 百度学术
    12. 李争杰. 新景煤矿8129进风巷支护方案优化研究. 煤. 2022(12): 92-95 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  112
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
  • PDF下载量:  236
  • 被引次数: 13
出版历程
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-02
  • 发布日期:  2022-04-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回